By: Kunle Oshobi
There is a peculiar audacity in a government that presides over one of the most dramatic economic contractions in a country’s peacetime history, then turns around to celebrate a modest rebound as evidence of visionary leadership. The Tinubu administration’s triumphant announcement of a 4.07% GDP growth rate is precisely that kind of audacity, the political equivalent of a doctor celebrating a patient’s slightly improved temperature after years of medical negligence nearly killed them.
Let us be clear about what this growth rate actually represents. It is not the fruit of coherent economic policy. It is not a vindication of the painful reforms imposed on ordinary Nigerians. It is, at its core, the natural gravitational pull of an economy that was artificially suppressed for years, attempting to return to its pre-collapse size. That is not progress. That is physics.
A Decade of Destruction: The Numbers Tell the Story
To understand why the 4.07% figure deserves scepticism rather than celebration, one must begin with context that the administration conveniently omits from its press releases. In 2015, when the APC under President Buhari inherited power from the PDP, Nigeria’s GDP stood at approximately $540 billion, a testament to years of sustained economic management and investment that had made Nigeria the largest economy in Africa. What followed was not reform. It was ruin.
Through a combination of destructive exchange rate policies, chronic underinvestment in the productive sectors, suffocating fuel subsidy dependency, and a fundamental hostility to the mechanisms of a market economy, successive APC administrations drove the economy into a prolonged tailspin. By 2024, Nigeria’s GDP had collapsed to approximately $188 billion, a staggering contraction of more than 65% in dollar terms, representing one of the most catastrophic economic declines ever recorded in a country not at war.
That is the true baseline against which this 4.07% growth must be measured. Not against the economy’s recent lows, but against where the economy should have been had it not been systematically mismanaged for over a decade.
The Rebasing Illusion
Faced with the embarrassment of presiding over an economy that had shrunk to a fraction of its former size, the Tinubu administration chose to rebase Nigeria’s GDP. On the surface, rebasing is a legitimate statistical exercise carried out periodically by countries to update the base year of their GDP calculations. In practice, the timing and manner of this rebasing had all the hallmarks of a cosmetic exercise designed to pad the numbers and obscure the depth of the economic damage.
The result was predictable: headline figures that looked somewhat less catastrophic on paper, giving the administration fresh ammunition for its narrative of reform and recovery. But rebasing does not create wealth. It does not employ the millions of Nigerians driven into poverty by collapsing real incomes. It does not rebuild the productive capacity that was lost during years of mismanagement. It merely rearranges the furniture while the house remains in disrepair.
A government confident in its economic record does not need to rebase its GDP figures at a moment of maximum political pressure. That it did so speaks volumes.
Gravity, Not Genius
The concept of mean reversion is well understood in economics. Economies that have been suppressed below their natural growth trajectory by policy failures, capital flight, and investor uncertainty tend to bounce back once the most acute sources of distress are partially addressed. This rebound is not the consequence of bold policy innovation. It is what economies do when the weight crushing them is partially lifted.
Nigeria’s modest recovery is consistent with exactly this phenomenon. Some of the most egregious distortions of the Buhari era, particularly around the official and parallel exchange rates, have been partially addressed under Tinubu, not through inspired policy design, but under the pressure of fiscal collapse and IMF conditionality. The resulting stabilisation, however chaotic and painful, has allowed some suppressed economic activity to resurface. That is the growth the administration is celebrating.
To put this in perspective, an economy recovering from a catastrophic multi-year contraction, recording a 4% growth rate, is not performing well. It is performing the bare minimum. A patient waking from a coma and managing to sit upright is not yet running a marathon.
The Obasanjo Benchmark: What Real Growth Looks Like
For Nigerians old enough to remember, or economists willing to look at the data honestly, there is a ready benchmark for what genuine, policy-driven economic growth looks like. Under the Obasanjo/Atiku administration from 1999 to 2007, Nigeria achieved an average annual GDP growth rate of approximately 7%, a sustained, consistent performance driven by debt relief, institutional reform, investment in infrastructure, and the liberalisation of key sectors including telecommunications.
At its peak in 2002, that administration recorded a growth rate of 15.3%, a figure that reflected not a recovering economy limping back from collapse, but an economy genuinely firing on multiple cylinders and attracting the confidence of domestic and international investors. Those were years in which poverty rates declined, foreign reserves accumulated, and the structural foundations of a modern economy were being carefully laid.
The contrast with today’s 4.07% could not be starker. The Tinubu administration’s best number is barely more than half the average achieved under Obasanjo/Atiku, and less than a third of the peak growth rate of that era. By any serious benchmark, this is not a success story. It is a cautionary tale about how far Nigeria has fallen.
Haphazard Reform Is No Reform at All
Perhaps the most troubling aspect of the current economic moment is not the mediocrity of the results but the incoherence of the means. The Tinubu administration has pursued what can charitably be described as reform-by-improvisation, policy announcements made without adequate preparation, reversals following public outcry, and an overall approach to economic management that resembles reactive firefighting more than strategic planning.
The removal of the fuel subsidy, whatever its long-term merits, was executed without any meaningful social safety net for the tens of millions of Nigerians immediately plunged into deeper poverty by the resulting price surge. The naira float, again arguably necessary, was unleashed into a foreign exchange market wholly unprepared for the shock, triggering inflation that has eroded real wages to levels not seen in a generation. Manufacturing has contracted. Food inflation has hit the poorest households with devastating force. Youth unemployment continues to push talented Nigerians out of the country in what has become a sustained haemorrhage of human capital.
There is no credible pathway to the kind of sustained, inclusive growth that Nigeria needs embedded in this administration’s current policy approach. Growth requires consistency. It requires investor confidence built on predictable rules and enforceable contracts. It requires public investment in power, transport, and education that creates the conditions for private enterprise to flourish. None of these ingredients are currently present in sufficient measure.
Conclusion: Do Not Be Deceived
A 4.07% growth rate in an economy that has lost more than 70% of its dollar value over the past decade is not an achievement to trumpet. It is, at best, a sign that the freefall may have temporarily paused. The economy is not growing; it is attempting to remember where it left off before APC governance drove it into the ditch.
Nigerians deserve honesty about where they are and how they got here. They deserve a government that acknowledges the scale of the damage done, presents a credible plan to reverse it, and is held to the standards set not by its own worst recent performance, but by the best that Nigeria has already demonstrated it can achieve.
Until the Tinubu administration can show growth rates that meaningfully approach, let alone exceed, the 7% average of the Obasanjo/Atiku years, the celebrations should remain firmly on hold. A country of Nigeria’s potential, resources, and human capital has no business applauding mediocrity, especially when that mediocrity comes dressed in the same political clothing that engineered the collapse in the first place.
Kunle Oshobi is the head of Strategy and Planning of the Narrative Force
